contoh Rubrik penilaian menulis teks deskriptif

Rubrik penilaian menulis teks deskriptif

KRITERIA	INDIKATOR	SKOR
KESESUAIAN  ISI	BAIK SEKALI Mengerjakan tugas  dengan amat baik, pembahasan amat baik, informasi relevan dan tepat, interpretasi sangat kuat dan mendukung.	81-100
	BAIK Mampu mengerjakan tugas dengan baik, pembahasan mampu, informasi umumnya relevan dan tepat, interpretasi umumnya mendukung	61-80
	CUKUP Kurang mampu mengerjakan tugas, pembehasan dapat diterima tapi kadang tidak konsisten, informasi kadang tidak relevan/ tidak tepat, interpretasi kadang tidak konsisten dengan fakta.	41-60
	KURANG Tidak bisa mngerjakan tugas, pembahasan tidak lengkap dan tidak konsisten, informasi sering tidak relevan/tidak tepat, interpretasi tidak konsisten dengan fakta	21-40
	KURANG SEKALI/TIDAK BISA DITERIMA Mengabaikan atau tidak memahami tugas, minim pembahasan, informasi dan interpretasi tidak relevan	00-20
KESESUAIAN LANGKAH/ RETORIKA	BAIK SEKALI Komunikasi efektif, sangat konsisten dengan bentuk teks khusus, ungkapan tertata dengan baik dan teratur, hubungan antar bagian teks jelas.	81-100
	BAIK Komunikasi cukup efektif, umumnya konsisten dengan bentuk teks khusus, organisasi dan urutan ungkapan umumnya tertata baik dan teratur, hubungan antar bagian teks umumnya jelas.	61-80
	CUKUP Komunikasi kadang cukup efektif, konsisten dengan bentuk teks khusus kadang terabaikan, panataan ungkapan kadang sulit diikuti, hubungan antar bagian teks kadang tidak jelas.	41-60
	KURANG Komunikasi tidak efektif, maksud tidak jelas, tidak mengikuti teks bentuk khusus, penataan dan urutan ungkapan membingungkan, hubungan antar bagian teks tidak jelas.	21-40
	KURANG SEKALI/TIDAK BISA DITERIMA Tidak bisa dipahami sama sekali, mengabaikan bentuk teks khusus, tidak ada penataan teks.	00-20
KESESUAIAN BAHASA	BAIK SEKALI Bahasa yang digunakan sangat sesuai dengan bentuk teks yang diberikan dan koteks komunikasi.	81-100
	BAIK Umumnya bahasa yang digunakan sesuai dengan bentuk teks yang diberikan dan konteks komunikasi.	61-80
	CUKUP Bahasa yang digunakan tidak konsisten dengan bentuk teks yang diberikan dan konteks.	41-60
	KURANG Bahasa yang digunakan tidak sesuai dengan bentuk teks yang diberikan dan konteks komunikasi	21-40
	KURANG SEKALI/TIDAK BISA DITERIMA Bahasa yang digunakan sangat buruk	00-20
KESESUAIAN BENTUK	SANGAT BAIK Bentuk, ejaan, pemilihan kata, tanda baca, penggunaan huruf besar, kerapian sangat memenuhi aturan teks.	81-100
	BAIK Bentuk, ejaan, pemilihan kata, kesesuaian, tanda baca, huruf  besar, dan kerapian umumnya  memenuhi aturan-aturan teks.	61-80
	CUKUP Bentuk, ejaan, pemilihan kata, kesesuaian, tanda baca, huruf  besar, dan kerapian sebagian  memenuhi aturan-aturan teks	41-60
	KURANG Bentuk, ejaan, pemilihan kata, kesesuaian, tanda baca, huruf  besar, dan kerapian umumnya tidak  memenuhi aturan-aturan teks	21-40
	KURANG SEKALI/TIDAK BISA DITERIMA Bentuk, ejaan, pemilihan kata, kesesuaian, tanda baca, huruf  besar, dan kerapian tidak  memenuhi aturan-aturan teks	00-20

Developing ideas
Point	Description
5	The descriptive text gives paragraph unity (topic, state good topic sentence, supporting sentence, concluding sentence) and coherence (relationship among ideas, understandable). It fulfill all criteria well
4	The descriptive text give paragraph unity (topic, state good topic sentence) but one of the criteria is weak.
3	The descriptive text give paragraph unity (topic, state topic sentence, conclusion of topic sentence) but some criteria above are weak
2	The descriptive text give paragraph unity (topic, state topic sentence) but most criteria above are weak
1	The descriptive text still give topic but all criteria are weak
Organizing ideas
5	The descriptive text is coherence and the coherences are correct. The text is using chronological order. The descriptive text repeat key words.
4	The descriptive text is coherence and the coherences are correct. Tehe text ususing chronological order
3	The descriptive text is coherence and some criteria are appropriate enough
2	The descriptive text is coherence but the coherences among sentences are weak
1	The descriptive text is not coherence
Grammar
5	Use present tense correctly, use relational verb and adjective words correctly
4	Use present tense, use relational verb but do not use adjective words correctly
3	Make errors of tenses, use relational words and use adjective words
2	Make errors of tenses, do not use relational verbs correctly, and use adjective words
1	Make errors of tenses, relational verbs and adjective words
Vocabulary
5	All or almost all of the descriptive text words are use effectively
4	Use many descriptive words effectively
3	Use some descriptive words
2	There are some mistakes in using descriptive words
1	Do not use the descriptive words correctly
Mechanics
5	The descriptive text uses correct punctuation, spelling and capitalization. It fulfill all criteria
4	The descriptive text uses correct punctuation, spelling but fairly capitalization but one of the criteria is weak
3	The descriptive text punctuation uses fairly punctuation but loosely correct spelling and capitalization. Some criteria are weak
2	The descriptive text uses fairly punctiation but inadequate correct spelling and capitalization. Most criteria are weak
1	The descriptive texts do not use correct punctiation, spelling and capitalization.

Kategori

Excellent.  Satisfactory.  Poor. Weak

Good

Attributes	1 point	2 points	3 points	4 points
Three essential structural elements are present -- introduction, body text, and  conclusion	Lacks two of the essential elements.	Lacks one of the essential elements.	Has introduction, adequate body text and conclusion.	All elements are present at high level of skill – appropriate proportions; high comprehension.
Interest level	Simplistic in style and content -- uses simple sentence structures; not original in ideas nor execution.	Addresses the topic in cursory manner.  Mixes simple and some compound sentences.  Has adequate content.	Intersperses higher level content with adequate content.  Uses compound and complex sentences as appropriate.	Excels in content and creative content with original ideas.  Skillful use of sentence types.
Use of details and descriptive phrases	Has only basic details – uses few descriptive terms, and they are mostly concrete.	Has basic details with some descriptive terms, a few descriptive phrases, and some abstract descriptive terms.	Skillfully uses more descriptive terms and phrases and other modifiers.	Exceptional use of abstract and concrete modifiers, phrases and descriptive language.
Use of transitions -- coherence	Little flow of ideas.  Blocky and disjointed.  Relevance not always clear.	Ideas have some flow, and are mostly on topic.	Ideas flow with transitional words, yet organization remains evident.  Included parts address the topic.	Exceptional use of vivid transitions.  Topical flow and organization are evident.  All parts highly relevant.
Use of supporting ideas	Expresses ideas with few supporting facts or opinions.	Expresses ideas with some supporting details and/or opinions.	Ideas are well supported with adequate detail and facts/opinions.	Exceptional use of supporting detail.  Facts and opinions are distinguished.
Mechanics and grammar are correct – end-marks, capitals, punctuation, subject/verb agreement	More than seven errors per 100 words.	Four to six errors per 100 words.	Two to three errors per 100 words.	Error free, or one error per 100 words.
Spelling (this may not be a graded element for some special need groups)	More than seven errors per 100 words.	Four to six errors per 100 words.	Two to three errors per 100 words.	Error free, or one error per 100 words.